By Marc Hertogh, Simon Halliday
The South African fact and Reconciliation fee (TRC) used to be organize to house the human rights violations of apartheid. notwithstanding, the TRC's restorative justice technique didn't consistently serve the wishes of groups at an area point. in response to prolonged anthropological fieldwork, this publication illustrates the impression of the TRC in city African groups in Johannesburg. It argues that the TRC had little influence on renowned principles of justice as retribution. This provocative research deepens our figuring out of post-apartheid South Africa and using human rights discourse.
Read Online or Download The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State PDF
Best jurisprudence books
Every self-discipline has its canon: the set of ordinary texts, methods, examples, and tales through which it's famous and which its individuals time and again invoke and hire. even if the final twenty-five years have obvious the impression of interdisciplinary techniques to criminal experiences extend, there was little fresh attention of what's and what needs to be canonical within the research of legislations today.
Legal Canons brings jointly fifteen essays which search to map out the criminal canon and how within which legislation is taught this day. in an effort to know how the dual rules of canons and canonicity function in legislations, each one essay makes a speciality of a selected element, from contracts and constitutional legislation to questions of race and gender. The ascendance of legislation and economics, feminism, severe race concept, and homosexual criminal experiences, in addition to the expanding impression of either rational-actor method and postmodernism, are all scrutinized via the prime students within the field.
A well timed and entire quantity, felony Canons articulates the necessity for, and capacity to, commencing the controversy on canonicity in felony studies.
The Baltic Yearbook of foreign legislations is an annual book containing contributions on topical concerns in foreign legislation and similar fields which are suitable to Baltic affairs and past. as well as articles on diverse points of overseas legislations, every one Yearbook makes a speciality of a subject with specific value to the improvement of foreign legislation.
Extra info for The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State
R Does accident law have undesirable collateral regulatory effects? For instance, does it encourage ‘defensive’ behaviour, and does it reduce participation in certain activities to sub-optimal levels? r What is the relationship between the deterrence function and the compensation function of accident law? What is the impact of insurance on the deterrence function? With appropriate modiﬁcations, each of these questions about the compensatory and deterrent functions of accident law could be asked in relation to judicial review.
High-proﬁle judicial review is – like bureaucratic judicial review – concerned with establishing and policing a legal framework for the conduct of government. But in terms of their subject matter and their political context and signiﬁcance, the two types of litigation are quite different. Whereas bureaucratic judicial review is concerned with the protection of the rights and interests of individuals (or, through the medium of representative standing, of groups of individuals) against government illegality, high-proﬁle judicial review is typically concerned with challenging government illegality as such ‘in the public interest’.
31 In a case involving the corrupt allocation of government housing to public servants, the Court laid down a detailed scheme for undoing the illegal allocations. In another case, instead of merely striking down a law that prohibited the issuing of rickshaw licences to non-operating owners, it put in place a scheme that enabled rickshaw operators to borrow the funds needed to acquire rickshaws from their owners. 32 In such cases, the judicial role is much closer to (and perhaps drew inspiration from) that played by US courts in (for instance) the prison reform litigation described by Malcolm Feeley in his essay – with the very important difference that, unlike its US counterparts, the Indian Court lacks the facilities and resources needed for active involvement in the implementation process.