By John Clifford Green
First released in 1999. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an Informa company.
Read Online or Download Financing the 1996 Election PDF
Best elections books
Specialist pollster Jeffrey M. Stonecash combines 17 years of functional polling adventure with educational thought to teach how and why polling is completed and what the easiest ways are to successful elections.
Cracked yet now not Shattered completely analyzes Hillary Clinton's 2008 crusade for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination with a watch to deciding on what went wrong-why, the frontrunner, she ended up now not breaking _the glass ceiling. _ even though her verbal exchange used to be fallacious and the media insurance of her did replicate biases, those essays display how her crusade used to be in difficulty from the beginning due to her gender, prestige as a former First woman, and being half a political couple.
This monograph deals a scientific quantitative method of the research, assessment, and layout of electoral platforms. this present day, electoral reform is of shock to child democracies in addition to many elderly ones. The authors use mathematical types and automated strategies, while attainable, to resolve a few of the difficulties that come up within the comparability of current structures in addition to within the building of recent ones.
This booklet analyzes sensible and ethical impacts on balloting judgements. Undermining the frequent assumption that monetary self-interest is the foremost determinant of balloting offerings, it discovers that ethical issues rooted in spiritual traditions are frequently the extra decisive. This discovering is proven via an in depth research of exact difficulties, corresponding to baby overlook and crime, difficulties which one might anticipate to hassle useful citizens.
Additional resources for Financing the 1996 Election
For example, two-thirds of the 1996 congressional donors reported contacting at least one member of Congress in the previous two years and one-sixth reported six or more such contacts. In contrast, less than one-third of general donors, one-seventh of voters, and one-twentieth of nonvoters reported a contact of any kind with a member of Congress (data not shown). Major donors routinely contribute to a variety of candidates and committees. 3 shows, two-thirds of 1988 presidential and three-quarters of 1996 congressional contributors reported regular and extensive giving.
The remaining 60 percent ($77 million) also must have consisted of contributions under $200. 4 million (64 percent of total individual contributions) under $500. 5). In 1992, these same committees spent $409 million. This represents a 52 percent increase in federal disbursements for the party committees. The Democrats were responsible for spending $214 million, an increase of over 36 percent compared to 1992. As with receipts, however, the Republicans outspent the Democrats with a total of $409 million in federal disbursements.
Fully 16 percent of those who gave to moderate incumbent Democrats were themselves Republicans, as were 13 percent of those who gave to liberal incumbents. Similar patterns occurred for giving across ideological lines. Almost one-tenth of all donations to conservative incumbent Republicans came from liberal donors, and more than one-tenth of contributions to liberal Democratic incumbents came from conservatives. There are many reasons for donors to cross party and ideological lines when contributing to congressional candidates.