Download Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and by Maria-Ionela Neagu PDF

  • admin
  • April 20, 2017
  • Elections
  • Comments Off on Download Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and by Maria-Ionela Neagu PDF

By Maria-Ionela Neagu

This booklet offers an in-depth inspect the cognitive and argumentative nature of political discourse with a spotlight at the function and position of conceptual metaphors in functional argumentation. Neagu's empirical research centres at the corpus of the yankee Presidential debates in 2008 and speeches via Barack Obama from 2009-2011.

Show description

Read Online or Download Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation PDF

Best elections books

Political Polling: Strategic Information in Campaigns

Expert pollster Jeffrey M. Stonecash combines 17 years of useful polling adventure with educational conception to teach how and why polling is finished and what the easiest methods are to profitable elections.

Cracked but Not Shattered: Hillary Rodham Clinton's Unsuccessful Campaign for the Presidency

Cracked yet now not Shattered completely analyzes Hillary Clinton's 2008 crusade for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination with a watch to determining what went wrong-why, the frontrunner, she ended up no longer breaking _the glass ceiling. _ even if her verbal exchange used to be fallacious and the media insurance of her did replicate biases, those essays reveal how her crusade was once in difficulty from the beginning as a result of her gender, prestige as a former First woman, and being 1/2 a political couple.

Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems (Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications)

This monograph bargains a scientific quantitative method of the research, review, and layout of electoral structures. this day, electoral reform is of outrage to child democracies in addition to many aged ones. The authors use mathematical versions and automated tactics, while attainable, to unravel a number of the difficulties that come up within the comparability of present platforms in addition to within the building of recent ones.

Social Structure and Voting in the United States

This publication analyzes functional and ethical impacts on balloting judgements. Undermining the frequent assumption that fiscal self-interest is the foremost determinant of balloting offerings, it discovers that ethical issues rooted in spiritual traditions are usually the extra decisive. This discovering is proven via a detailed research of exact difficulties, comparable to baby forget and crime, difficulties which one might count on to hassle useful electorate.

Additional info for Decoding Political Discourse: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation: Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation

Example text

Argumentum ad baculum introduces ‘force as a means of persuasion’ (Pirie, 2006: 17–18). The protagonist can either threaten with physical violence or insinuate possible unpleasant outcomes for somebody. Indirect threats hold the prospect of ominous events.  Argumentum ad misericordiam elicits the audience’s sympathy, thus maneuvering the interlocutor into an awkward position.  Fallacies in the opening stage  Shifting or evading the burden of proof represents the strategy that helps the speakers to divest themselves from providing evidence to support their standpoints.

These generic types can be integrated within the category of ‘pre-genre’ (Swales, 1990). However, a genre can also be ‘disembedded’ (Giddens, 1991) from its original social practice and thus, it can transcend other practices from different scales (local, national, global). Those types that are specialized for certain social practices represent ‘situated genres’ (Fairclough, 2003: 69). ’ – identifying the purposes of the genre used, distinguishing between ‘strategic’ and ‘communicative’ action (Habermas, 1984), analyzing their organizational pattern (‘generic structure,’ Fairclough (2003: 72)), the script; social relations – relations of power/social hierarchy, relations of solidarity/social distance (Brown and Gilman, 1960); communication technologies – mediated vs.

1057/9781137309907 34 Decoding Political Discourse by Walton, 2001), and other discourse analysts showed that scientific definitions may serve competing interests. Similarly, a conceptual metaphor should be accepted, rejected, or criticized on linguistic and argumentative grounds in just the same way that a legal definition should be evaluated on legal grounds and economic definitions on economic grounds and so on. But aren’t legal, economic, political, scientific definitions also metaphorical in nature?

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.28 of 5 – based on 40 votes