Download Commonwealth Caribbean Tort Law: Text, Cases & Materials by Gilbe Kodilinye, Gilbert Kodilinye PDF

  • admin
  • April 20, 2017
  • Jurisprudence
  • Comments Off on Download Commonwealth Caribbean Tort Law: Text, Cases & Materials by Gilbe Kodilinye, Gilbert Kodilinye PDF

By Gilbe Kodilinye, Gilbert Kodilinye

This article is designed to provide legislation scholars within the Caribbean a uncomplicated textual content on torts, observed via extracts from West Indian instances and an important statutory provisions. Emphasis is put on these subject matters most ordinarily litigated within the West Indies - negligence, nuisance, defamation, trespass to the individual, employers' legal responsibility and passing off. even though basically conceived as a textual content for college kids interpreting for the LLB measure within the West Indies, practitioners should still locate the ebook priceless within the approach within which it brings to gentle many hitherto unreported decisions.

Show description

Read or Download Commonwealth Caribbean Tort Law: Text, Cases & Materials PDF

Best jurisprudence books

Legal Canons

Every self-discipline has its canon: the set of ordinary texts, methods, examples, and tales wherein it really is famous and which its individuals many times invoke and hire. even though the final twenty-five years have visible the impression of interdisciplinary techniques to criminal reviews extend, there was little contemporary attention of what's and what needs to be canonical within the learn of legislations today.

Legal Canons brings jointly fifteen essays which search to map out the criminal canon and how during which legislation is taught this present day. that allows you to know how the dual rules of canons and canonicity function in legislation, each one essay makes a speciality of a selected point, from contracts and constitutional legislation to questions of race and gender. The ascendance of legislation and economics, feminism, serious race thought, and homosexual criminal reports, in addition to the expanding impact of either rational-actor method and postmodernism, are all scrutinized through the best students within the field.

A well timed and entire quantity, criminal Canons articulates the necessity for, and ability to, commencing the talk on canonicity in felony studies.

Baltic Yearbook of International Law, Volume 6 (2006)

The Baltic Yearbook of overseas legislations is an annual book containing contributions on topical concerns in foreign legislation and comparable fields which are suitable to Baltic affairs and past. as well as articles on varied elements of foreign legislation, each one Yearbook makes a speciality of a topic with specific value to the improvement of overseas legislations.

Extra info for Commonwealth Caribbean Tort Law: Text, Cases & Materials

Sample text

Under this rule, the victim of an aggravated assault, for example, cannot sue his assailant in tort unless and until the latter has been prosecuted. In Hibbert v AG (1988) Supreme Court, Jamaica, No CL H-187 of 1982 (unreported), Gordon J held that the production of a letter from the Director of Public Prosecutions, indicating that no criminal prosecution for assault was advised, satisfied the rule in Smith v Selwyn. In Buckle v Dunkley (1966) Court of Appeal, Jamaica, Civ App No 29 of 1965 (unreported), it was held that, if the victim of an alleged felony reports the facts to the police and the latter decide not to prosecute, the victim is entitled to go ahead with his civil action, since he will have taken all the steps that the law requires him to take to procure the prosecution of the alleged offender.

The effect in such cases is that the civil and criminal remedies are not alternative but concurrent, each being independent of the other. The wrongdoer may be punished by imprisonment or fine, and he may also be compelled in a civil action for tort to pay damages to the injured person by way of compensation. 4 Finally, an important distinction between tort and crime is that, to succeed in a criminal trial, the prosecution must prove its case ‘beyond reasonable doubt’, whereas in an action in tort, the plaintiff is merely required to establish his claim ‘on a balance of probabilities’.

2 Because of this common historical origin, today the ingredients of the torts are virtually identical to those of the crimes. There are, in addition, several examples of conduct which are both criminal and tortious. For instance, if A steals B’s bicycle, he will be 1 2 McKendrick, LLB Tort Textbook, 5th edn, Sydney: HLT, p 2. Fifoot, History and Sources of the Common Law, 1949, London: Stevens, p 45. 2 Introduction guilty of the crime of theft (or larceny); at the same time, A will be liable to B for the tort of conversion.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.71 of 5 – based on 5 votes